TodayWorkPlanning Reform: Obtain the primary GOV.UK consultation or policy source
Needs team input

Planning Reform: Obtain the primary GOV.UK consultation or policy source

Linked to Planning Reform

OwnerPA Intelligence/source owner
Next deadlineNo date
Outputs2
THE BRIEF ALEX IS WORKING FROM

The current next action identifies this as the blocker to proposal-level analysis and a defensible response. Strategy phase: Clarify the live policy window Timing: Immediate Source: approved Issue strategy version 1.

Current next move ↓

The current next action identifies this as the blocker to proposal-level analysis and a defensible response. Strategy phase: Clarify the live policy window Timing: Immediate Source: approved Issue strategy version 1.

Keep working with Alex

Ask for a revision, another briefing format, a deadline change or give Alex the missing evidence. The conversation stays attached to this job.

Continue this work with Alex →
WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN NOW

Answer 3 evidence questions

Alex has completed the useful work possible without guessing and will continue from the answer.

ALEX’S LATEST READNeeds team input
Ask Alex about this work →

I've prepared Planning Reform: Consultation Analysis Framework as a draft.

IssuePlanning Reform
ConfidenceNot recorded
Progress2 of 5 steps
PROGRESS

The next step

2 / 5

Alex keeps the full plan underneath this simple view.

!
CURRENT STEPComplete proposal-level consultation analysis

The consultation proposals and questions cannot be assessed until the primary GOV.UK source is supplied.

View full workplan5 steps
Set the policy assessment frameworkCompleted

I have mapped the required assessment against our approved position, fallback and red line.

Prepare the internal planning reform briefCompleted

The brief captures our objective, policy test and the issues that matter for infrastructure delivery.

!
Complete proposal-level consultation analysisWaiting

The consultation proposals and questions cannot be assessed until the primary GOV.UK source is supplied.

NEEDS INPUTPA Intelligence/source owner
Provide input →
!
Identify internal evidence gapsWaiting

Company-specific evidence on consenting delays, duplicated requirements and delivery impacts should be tested once the source defines the relevant proposals.

NEEDS INPUTOperations and project delivery
Provide input →
!
Prepare a first-pass internal responseWaiting

A response draft would risk addressing the wrong proposals without the consultation text and deadline.

NEEDS INPUTPA Intelligence/source owner
Provide input →
NEEDS YOU

3 things Alex needs

3 open

Each request is kept short. Give Alex the answer directly and the work can continue.

!
WaitingPA Intelligence/source owner

Complete proposal-level consultation analysis

Please provide the primary GOV.UK consultation or policy source, including publication date and response deadline, so I can assess each proposal…

View other requests2
!
WaitingOperations and project delivery

Identify internal evidence gaps

Please provide verified examples of planning or consenting delays, duplicated evidence requirements and delivery impacts relevant to the consulta…

!
WaitingPA Intelligence/source owner

Prepare a first-pass internal response

Please provide the consultation text first; I will then prepare an internal-only response draft for approval, without sending it externally.

OUTPUTSDrafts and briefingsReview, share or continue from the latest versions.
2 current
ALEX CAN ALSO HELPMore ways to move this workCreate a brief or ask Alex to continue from the current evidence.
Open
ALEX CAN DO THIS NOWKeep this Work Item moving
COMPANY POSITIONPreferred position, fallback and red lines
View
Preferred position

Government should simplify consenting and introduce clearer decision deadlines for nationally significant and regionally important infrastructure, while retaining appropriate environmental and community safeguards.

Fallback

Support administrative reforms that reduce duplication between consenting bodies and improve pre-application coordination if full statutory reform is not achievable.

Red lines

Reforms should not create new parallel approval processes that add time or duplicate evidence requirements.

SOURCE & SUPPORTING EVIDENCESource information
View
No source attached.